Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446320›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Pharmacologic Treatments for Dementia and the Risk of Developing Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Jingya Wang, Christina Antza, Wen Hwa Lee, Jesse Coker, Pearse A Keane, Alastair K Denniston, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Nicola J Adderley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jingya WangDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Christina AntzaDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Wen Hwa LeeAction Against Age-Related Macular Degeneration, London, United Kingdom.
Jesse CokerAction Against Age-Related Macular Degeneration, London, United Kingdom.
Pearse A KeaneNIHR (National Institute for Health and Care Research) Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alastair K DennistonDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Nicola J AdderleyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T019050/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness among people aged 50 years or older worldwide. There is a need for new strategies for the prevention and treatment of AMD. There is some limited evidence to suggest the possibility of a protective association of dementia medications with the development of some types of AMD, but the evidence is weak. Objective: To investigate whether the dementia medications memantine and donepezil are associated with the risk of developing AMD. Design, Setting, and Participants: Three population-based cohort studies were performed using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD and Aurum databases from May 15, 2002, to June 21, 2022. Participants included individuals with dementia (vascular dementia, nonvascular dementia, or Alzheimer disease) aged 40 years or older. Statistical analysis was carried out between February and November 2023. Exposures: Exposures were dementia medications. Cohort 1 compared patients prescribed donepezil with those prescribed rivastigmine or galantamine using the new-user design. Cohort 2 compared memantine with donepezil, rivastigmine, or galantamine using the prevalent new-user design. In a sensitivity analysis, cohort 3 compared memantine with rivastigmine or galantamine only. Main Outcomes and Measures: New diagnosis of AMD. Results: There were 132 846 individuals (mean [SD] age, 80.4 [7.6] years; 61.8% women; mean [SD] body mass index [BMI], 25.5 [4.6]) with a diagnosis of dementia included in cohort 1, 159 419 individuals (mean [SD] age, 81.2 [7.6] years; 59.7% women; mean [SD] body mass index [BMI], 25.6 [4.7]) with a diagnosis of dementia included in cohort 2, and 92 328 individuals with a diagnosis of dementia included in cohort 3 (mean [SD] age, 80.9 [7.7] years; 58.5% women; mean [SD] body mass index [BMI], 25.5 [4.7]). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for donepezil compared with rivastigmine or galantamine (cohort 1) was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.67-1.35). The adjusted HR for memantine compared with donepezil, rivastigmine, or galantamine (cohort 2) was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.83-1.27). The adjusted HR for memantine vs rivastigmine or galantamine only (cohort 3) was 1.24 (95% CI, 0.83-1.86). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of patients with dementia found no significant associations between memantine or donepezil compared with other dementia medications and the risk of development of AMD. Further research is recommended to examine any possible pathophysiological protective action of memantine and other dementia medications against the development of AMD.

Indexed as

DementiaDonepezilGalantamineMacular DegenerationMemantineAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNootropic AgentsRisk FactorsRivastigmineDonepezilGalantamineMemantineNootropic AgentsRivastigmine

Identifiers

PMID39446320
PMCPMC11581610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.