SynthesisUpdates in surgery2024
Is the transection of the hernia sac during laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty safe and feasible? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a debate over whether to transect or completely reduce the hernia sac during laparoscopic tension-free repair of inguinal hernia. This study endeavors to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of two approaches, namely transected sac (TS) and completely reduced sac (RS), in laparoscopic tension-free repair of inguinal hernia. Utilizing a meta-analysis methodology, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of these techniques. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify comparative studies focusing on laparoscopic tension-free repair of inguinal hernia, specifically comparing TS and RS techniques. The selected studies were subjected to meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 8 studies, involving 2995 patients with inguinal hernia, were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis results revealed that the TS group had a higher incidence of seroma compared to the RS group [OR = 1.74, 95% CI (1.35, 2.25), P < 0.0001], and a prolonged time to return to normal activity postoperatively [MD = 0.99, 95% CI (0.85, 1.14), P < 0.00001]. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operation time [MD = -1.75, 95% CI (- 8.72, 5.22), P = 0.62], incidence of postoperative pain [OR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.41, 2.44), P = 1.00], overall postoperative complication rate [OR = 0.98, 95% CI (0.43, 2.20), P = 0.95], and recurrence rate fOR = 2.53, 95% CI (0.61, 10.39), P = 0.20]. Transected sac in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is associated with an increased incidence of seroma and a longer recovery time for patients to return to normal activity. Clinical trial registration Registration number is INPLASY20223110070.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39446302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.