ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024
An exploratory study of perceptions and utilization of genetic information in the intended parent experience of oocyte donor selection.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scoping review and recommendations for development and delivery of education resources for reproductive genetic carrier screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Discrepancies between application and genetic consultation during routine ovum donor screening in large fertility network.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Stakeholders' experiences and perspectives of reproductive genetic carrier screening in gamete donation: a scoping review.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUtilization of oocyte donation has become an increasingly common practice in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Since the introduction of larger carrier screening (CS) panels and extended family medical histories (EFMH), studies have not examined how this information factors into the oocyte donor selection process. This exploratory, qualitative study provides further insight into what role, if any, donors' available genetic information (e.g., larger CS panels and EFMH) plays in selecting an oocyte donor.
methodsAn online screening survey was distributed to individuals who have undergone or are currently in the process of selecting an oocyte donor through the RESOLVE network and Mayo Clinic's Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility clinic. From 13 survey respondents, six oocyte recipients subsequently participated in semi-structured telephone interviews and discussed their experiences as oocyte recipients including their perceptions of donors' available genetic information and process in choosing an oocyte donor.
resultsGenetic information was seen as valuable and reassuring for participants, particularly EFMH, but did not play a significant role in the selection process for these participants. Supplemental emergent themes provide context on the psychosocial complexities of the oocyte recipient experience and possible explanations for why genetic information is not a decisional priority. Participants indicated genetic information was not extensively discussed or fully explained by providers.
conclusionsResults demonstrate how genetic counselors can be more involved in the pre-selection process to discuss the utility and limitations of genetic information, as well as address psychosocial issues common to the oocyte recipient experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.