Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446225›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2025

An explainable machine learning estimated biological age based on morphological parameters of the spine.

Zi Xu, Yunsong Peng, Mudan Zhang, Rongpin Wang, Zhenlu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advances and challenges in AI-assisted MRI for lumbar disc degeneration detection and classification.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zi Xu *Department of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial Peoples Hospital, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China.
Yunsong Peng *Department of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial Peoples Hospital, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China.
Mudan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial Peoples Hospital, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China.
Rongpin WangDepartment of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial Peoples Hospital, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China. wangrongpin@126.com.
Zhenlu YangDepartment of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial Peoples Hospital, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China. yangzhenlu0105@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4646-2799

Funding

Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital Talent Fund [2022]-4Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital Talent Fund [2022]-5Guizhou Provincial Youth Science and Technology Talents Growth Project [2023]-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately estimating biological age is beneficial for measuring aging and predicting risk. It is widely accepted that the prevalence of spine compression increases significantly with age. However, biological age based on vertebral morphological data is rarely reported. In this study, a total of 2,364 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were enrolled, and morphological parameters of the spine were collected from lateral radiographs scanned by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The biological age of the spine, called SpineAge, was calculated with the parameters by machine learning models. The SHapley Additive exPlanation was used for better interpreting each parameter's contribution. Besides, an Accelerated Aging Index (AAI) was defined as SpineAge minus chronological age and was used to quantify the accelerating aging degree of the spine. The results indicated that the SpineAge performed better than chronological age did in predicting 2-year and 5-year all-cause mortality. After adjusting all covariates, there was a significant association between AAI and all-cause mortality risk. Specifically, each 1-year increase in AAI was associated with a 25.9% increase in all-cause mortality risk (Hazards ratio, 1.259; 95% CI, 1.087-1.457; P < 0.001). Considering the first quartile of AAI as a reference, the mortality risks for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 2.389 (95% CI, 1.064-5.364; P = 0.035), 5.911 (95% CI, 2.241-15.590; P < 0.001) and 22.925 (95% CI, 4.744-110.769; P < 0.001) times higher, respectively. Our study developed a novel and highly applicable biological-age predictor for predicting individualized long-term prognosis and facilitating personalized care.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonAgingMachine LearningSpineAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysAgingBiological ageDual energy X-ray absorptiometryMachine learningNHANESSpine

Identifiers

PMID39446225
PMCPMC11979066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.