ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
360° CZT-SPECT/CT cameras:
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimisation of Q.Clear (BSREM) Reconstruction Parameters forBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative accuracy ofEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Experimental Evaluation of DE-SPECT: A Hyperspectral SPECT System for Region-Selective 3-D Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026Article
- Instrumentation Digital Twins in PET and SPECT Imaging: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- A critical phantom study of the energy window used forEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Quantitative capabilities of commercial CZT SPECT-CT cameras withEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor the first time, three currently available 360° CZT-SPECT/CT cameras were compared under clinical conditions using phantom-based measurements.
methodsA
resultsDespite the higher sensitivity of VERITON cameras and the enhanced energy resolution of the V400 (3.2% at 140 keV, 5.2% at 113 keV, and 3.6% at 208 keV), StarGuide presents comparable image quality. This highlights the need to differentiate sensitivity from count quality, which is influenced by hardware design (collimator, detector block) and conditions image quality as well as the reconstruction process (algorithms, scatter correction, noise regulation). For
conclusionsThe three cameras have equivalent potential for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.