ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024
Short and longterm outcome of minimally invasive therapy of median arcuate ligament syndrome.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes in laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Laparoscopic surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome: How to do it.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Approach to Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Intraoperative evaluation of median arcuate ligament syndrome using a transit-time flowmeter: a case report.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- A rare case of median arcuate ligament syndrome presenting with chronic abdominal pain managed surgically: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMedian arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a rare disorder caused by compression of the celiac artery (CA) by the median arcuate ligament (MAL). Common symptoms include postprandial abdominal pain, diarrhea, and weight loss. While laparoscopic MAL division has long been considered the procedure of choice, robotic-assisted procedures have been increasingly used since their introduction. Aim of this study was to evaluate peri- and postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive MAL release.
methodsA retrospective analysis of patients undergoing minimally invasive MAL release at the Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, between 2014 and 2023 was performed.
results20 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent either laparoscopic (n = 3) or robotic (n = 17) MAL release. Most common preoperative symptoms were postprandial abdominal pain (90%), weight loss (45%), diarrhea (30%), and nausea (25%). Comparing laparoscopic and robotic surgery, neither the median duration of surgery (minutes: 98 (90-290) vs. 125 (80-254); p = 0.765), the median length of hospital stay (days: 4 (3-4) vs. 5 (3-6); p = 0.179) and intraoperative blood loss (< 50 ml in both groups, p = 1.0) showed significant differences. Peak systolic velocity in the CA was significantly reduced postoperatively (cm/s: 320 (200-765) vs. 167 (100-500), p < 0.001). Postoperatively, 17 (85%) patients reported symptom improvement, while 4 (20%) patients had no symptom relief at last follow-up. In 3 cases, follow-up imaging showed evidence of respiratory-related CA stenosis.
conclusionDespite being complex and challenging procedures, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted MAL release are safe procedures with low risk of postoperative complications and good longterm outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.