ArticleMikrochimica acta2024
An innovative strategy for Gefitinib quantification in pharmaceutical and plasma samples using a graphene quantum dots-combined gold nanoparticles composite electrochemical sensor.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An innovative methodology is proposed for quantifying Gefitinib (GFT) using an electrochemical sensor constructed from a composite of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). GQDs were synthesized from graphite, preserving graphene's large surface area and excellent electron transfer capabilities while enhancing dispersibility. The combination of GQDs with AuNPs resulted in an AuNPs@GQDs composite, which was used to construct the sensor. The synthesized nanomaterials were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the electrochemical performance of the sensor was evaluated via cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). Under optimized conditions, the sensor displayed a linear calibration curve for GFT detection within the range 0.01 to 10.0 µM, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.005 µM (S/N = 3). The sensor demonstrated excellent anti-interference properties and stability in tests using pharmaceutical formulations and plasma samples. Compared to chromatographic methods, the sensor exhibited similar accuracy and recovery. Its easy fabrication and high sensitivity make it a promising tool for pharmaceutical analysis and clinical therapeutic drug monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39446161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.