Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446094›Full record

Observational studyExperimental physiology2024

Mexican Hispanics show significant improvement in lung function approximately 1 year after having severe COVID-19.

Arturo Cortes-Telles, Luis Alberto Solís-Díaz, Heidegger Mateos-Toledo, Jordan A Guenette, Gerald Stanley Zavorsky

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arturo Cortes-TellesClínica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Península de Yucatán, IMSS-Bienestar, Mérida, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-5604
Luis Alberto Solís-DíazClínica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Península de Yucatán, IMSS-Bienestar, Mérida, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-1929
Heidegger Mateos-ToledoClínica de Enfermedades Intersticiales del Pulmón, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, CdMx, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6125-2565
Jordan A GuenetteCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, Providence Research, The University of British Columbia and St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-4547
Gerald Stanley ZavorskyDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4473-1601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long-term effects of COVID-19 on lung function are not understood, especially for periods extending beyond 1 year after infection. This observational, longitudinal study investigated lung function in Mexican Hispanics who experienced severe COVID-19, focusing on how the length of recovery affects lung function improvements. At a specialized COVID-19 follow-up clinic in Yucatan, Mexico, lung function and symptoms were assessed in patients who had recovered from severe COVID-19. We used z-scores, and Wilcoxon's signed rank test to analyse changes in lung function over time. Lung function was measured twice in 82 patients: the first and second measurements were taken a median of 94 and 362 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, respectively. Initially, 61% of patients exhibited at least one of several pulmonary function abnormalities (lower limit of normal = -1.645), which decreased to 22% of patients by 390 days post-recovery. Considering day-to-day variability in lung function, 68% of patients showed improvement by the final visit, while 30% had unchanged lung function from the initial assessment. Computed tomography (CT) scans revealed ground-glass opacities in 33% of patients. One year after infection, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide z-scores accounted for 30% of the variation in CT fibrosis scores. There was no significant correlation between the length of recovery and improvement in lung function based on z-scores. In conclusion, 22% of patients who recovered from severe COVID-19 continued to show at least one lung function abnormality 1 year after recovery, indicating a prolonged impact of COVID-19 on lung health.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hispanic or LatinoLungRespiratory Function TestsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMexicoMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionSeverity of Illness IndexTomography, X-Ray Computeddiffusing capacityobstructionrecoveryrestrictionSARS‐CoV‐2spirometry

Identifiers

PMID39446094
PMCPMC11607618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.