ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2024
Investigating the antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties of marine halophilic Bacillus species against ESKAPE pathogens.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacillus halotolerans XJ-1 inhibits the fungal pathogen Fusarium asiaticum while promoting the growth of maize.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Anti-inflammatory effect of aFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Investigating the antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties of marine halophilic Bacillus species against ESKAPE pathogens.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), known as the "silent pandemic," is exacerbated by pathogenic bacteria's ability to form biofilms. Marine compounds hold promise for novel antibacterial drug discovery. Two isolates from preliminary saltwater environment screening demonstrated antimicrobial activity and were subsequently identified as Bacillus subtilis MTUA2 and Bacillus velezensis MTUC2. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), minimum biofilm inhibition concentrations (MBICs) and minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBECs) required to prevent and/or disrupt bacterial growth and biofilm formation were established for MRSA, Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli. The metabolic activity within biofilms was determined by the 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride assay. Both Bacillus species exhibited unique antimicrobial effects, reducing MRSA and S. aureus planktonic cell growth by 50% and sessile cell growth for S. aureus and E. coli by 50% and 90%, respectively. No effect was observed against A. baumannii. Significant MBIC and MBEC values were achieved, with 99% inhibition and 90% reduction in MRSA and S. aureus biofilms. Additionally, 90% and 50% inhibition was observed in E. coli and A. baumannii biofilms, respectively, with a 50% reduction in E. coli biofilm. These findings suggest that the mode of action employed by B. subtilis MTUA2 and B. velezensis MTUC2 metabolites should be further characterized and could be beneficial if used independently or in combination with other treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.