Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39445810›Full record

Trial reportHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

The Dilemmas and Opportunities of Co-Creating Health Interventions to Fit Local Contexts: An Ethnographic Study on the Adaptation of Clinical Guidelines in Tanzania.

Haika Osaki, Morten Skovdal, Jane Brandt Sørensen, Nanna Maaløe, Natasha Housseine, Brenda Sequeira Dmello, Columba Mbekenga

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04685668 (Enabling Best Post Possible Childbirth Care in Tanzania.), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04685668 nacompletednot on this map

Enabling Best Post Possible Childbirth Care in Tanzania.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2021 to 2023Enrolled65,181ConditionsStillbirth, Delivery Complication, Delivery Delayed, ApgarArmsThe PartoMa guidelines and training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haika OsakiDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten SkovdalDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jane Brandt SørensenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nanna MaaløeDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Natasha HousseineDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brenda Sequeira DmelloDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Columba MbekengaSchool of Nursing, Kairuki University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

We also thank the Danida Fellowship Centre (DFC) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (DFC file no.18-08-KU, Enabling best possible childbirth care in Tanzania) for funding this study.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare providers' role in co-creating health interventions and implementation strategies has evolved significantly, and yet, there is little documentation of this from low-resource settings. This study aims to share the dilemmas of engaging healthcare providers in co-creating locally adapted clinical guidelines for maternity facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and strategies used to address them.

methodsAn ethnographic study explored the co-creation of locally adapted clinical guidelines for childbirth care within five maternity facilities in Dar es Salaam. Participant observations were conducted during 11 co-creation workshops. Six in-depth interviews explored participant experiences. Data were analyzed using Attride-Stirling's thematic network analysis framework.

resultsThe analysis revealed four themes representing dilemmas in the co-creation process and strategies to improve co-creation: (i) navigating diverse contexts: adapting a single set of guidelines to various, diverse facilities was challenging; this was addressed through engaging in dialogue and flexibility while adjusting care practices. (ii) Competing knowledge systems and sources: differing knowledge sources between researchers and healthcare providers challenged discussions on recommended practices. However, validating scientific recommendations with practical care experience in this context helped bridge this gap. (iii) Fostering meaningful participation: participation was time-consuming for some. However, early stakeholder engagement and facility-led participant selection facilitated the meaningful involvement of healthcare providers. (iv) Power imbalances: power dynamics influenced the co-creation process; involving stakeholders in planning and co-facilitating workshops helped mitigate these imbalances and encourage more equal participation.

conclusionNavigating contextual variation, differences in knowledge systems, meaningful participation and power dynamics were key challenges in the co-creation process. However, reflexivity, open and honest dialogue with stakeholders and early engagement enhanced the co-creation process. Co-creating locally adapted clinical guidelines with frontline healthcare workers and scientific experts is essential for feasibility and safety. Further research is needed to explore context specificity, decision-making and the efficacy of co-creation in low-resource settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Healthcare providers and health managers from five maternity facilities who participated in the co-creation process were actively involved in this study by providing their consent to be interviewed about their experiences of participation. CLINICAL

trial registrationThis study is a substudy within the PartoMa project. PartoMa is a registered clinical trial with the trial registration number NCT04685668. PartoMa's date of initial trial registration is 28 December 2020.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalHealth PersonnelPractice Guidelines as TopicFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyQualitative ResearchTanzaniachildbirth careclinical guidelinesco‐creationethnographic studyparticipatory researchTanzania

Identifiers

PMID39445810
PMCPMC11500208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.