ArticleEndocrinology2024
Evaluation of Osteogenic Phenotype in Postmenopausal Women Receiving Anabolic and Antiresorptive Osteoporosis Therapies.
Article in Endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative bone histomorphometry effects of combined denosumab and teriparatide vs monotherapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026Trial
- Intermittent parathyroid hormone employs autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms to drive osteogenesis from Ebf3-expressing skeletal progenitor cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Investigation of depressive symptoms in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, specialized psychological nursing intervention measures, and key point analysis.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aging of the general population has led to a substantial increase in the prevalence of osteoporosis over the past decades. While there are effective pharmacological agents that increase bone formation, decrease bone resorption, and decrease fracture risk, they do not uniformly cure osteoporosis. This has prompted investigations to examine whether combination therapy (COMBO) with these agents can result in an additive benefit. Since concomitant therapy with denosumab and teriparatide has shown promise in this respect, investigations were undertaken to explore whether the changes in osteogenic phenotype could provide insight into the cellular and molecular mechanism of this effect. Investigations were performed in postmenopausal women receiving denosumab, teriparatide, or both for 3 months. Histomorphometric parameters were the primary outcome, while exploratory studies examined RNA expression in bone biopsies as well as in sorted and cultured bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Osteogenic colony forming units of BMSCs were also evaluated. The studies demonstrated that COMBO results in an increase in osteoprogenitors, evidenced by an increase in osteoblastic colony-forming units. This was associated with an increased in BMSC expression of LGR6 (leucine-rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 6), a stem cell marker and activator of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. These data suggest that enhancement of canonical Wnt signaling contributes to the increase in osteoprogenitors and consequently an increase in bone density in postmenopausal women receiving COMBO for osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.