ArticleComprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology2024
Is age more than a number? Accounting for adult development and aging in the study of psychoneuroimmunology, stress, and health.
Article in Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoarthritis and dementia: contrasting disorders driven by mutual pathways of autophagy, mTOR, GLP-1, AMPK, Wnt, and WISP1.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Introduction to the special issue: A festschrift for Janice Kiecolt-Glaser - At the origin of stress and immunity.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional stress-and-health models link stressors to their health consequences through a well-characterized cascade. Most of the research assumes that the stress-health sequence unfolds in the same way across adulthood, whether a person is 25 years old or 80. Taking a "developmental" or "lifespan" approach has been synonymous with studying the lasting health impacts of early life experiences. However, theories and evidence from adult development and geroscience suggest that stress-health dynamics evolve in important ways over the adult lifespan-from the stressors that we encounter, to the emotion regulation strategies that we use to confront challenges, to the psychosocial resources at our disposal, to the cellular milieu, and thus to the magnitude of stressors' biological and functional consequences. This critical review synthesizes theoretical perspectives and selected empirical literature on the social-emotional and biological dimensions of aging to promote an Integrative Model of Aging, Stress, and Health. Through this integration, the model illustrates how an interdisciplinary, developmental perspective can enrich our understanding of stress's consequences for health across adulthood. It also seeks to guide a new generation of research questions that confront aging with a multidimensional approach. The piece concludes with personal reflections on the foundational legacy of the author's mentor, Dr. Janice Kiecolt-Glaser.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.