ArticleCureus2024
Medial Meniscal Extrusion After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) Associated With Meniscal Repair and Preoperative Extrusion.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical efficacy of ramp lesion treatment: a systematic review and meta analysis study.European journal of translational myology · 2026Article
- Progression of medial meniscal extrusion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction correlates with graft diameter: a retrospective longitudinal study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis remains high even after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Medial meniscal extrusion (MME) is a valuable clinical sign as an early morphological change. This study aimed to analyze MME before and after ACLR and investigate the factors affecting postoperative MME. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included patients who underwent anatomical double-bundle ACLR between January 2016 and July 2021. MME was measured using MRI preoperatively and one year postoperatively. The medial meniscus (MM) treatments were categorized into three groups: no MM injury and no repair (no injury/no repair (N/N)), MM injury but no repair (injury/no repair (I/N)), and MM injury and repair (injury/repair (I/R)). We investigated the factors influencing MME after ACLR using multiple linear regression analysis and compared MME before and after ACLR using paired t-tests.
resultsThis study included 133 patients, of whom 90 (37 males and 53 females) were analyzed. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 27.5 years, and 41, 27, and 22 patients were assigned into N/N, I/N, and I/R groups, respectively. Preoperative MME (p<0.001) and I/R (p<0.001) had significant effects on postoperative MME in a regression analysis. Postoperative MME had greater effects than the preoperative MME in all cases (1.16 and 1.53 mm (p<0.01)) and in every MM treatment group (N/N: 1.02 and 1.32 mm (p<0.01), I/N: 1.16 and 1.44 mm (p<0.01), and I/R: 1.42 and 2.05 mm (p<0.001)).
conclusionsLarger preoperative MME and receiving MM repair were significantly associated with a larger MME after ACLR. Postoperative MME in ACLR patients was significantly greater than preoperative MME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.