ArticleCureus2024
Analysis of Caudal Regression Syndrome: A Case Report From Bulgaria.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A rare congenital condition known as caudal regression syndrome (CRS) or caudal dysplasia sequence (CDS) is defined by deformity of the caudal (lower) half of the body, which can have different effects on skeletal, neurological, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems. A 19-year-old G1P0 woman presented for a fetal anomaly scan at 27+6 weeks of gestation due to suspected oligohydramnios. The patient reported a history of maternal diabetes type 1 on insulin for the past 10 years. She presented with severe generalized edema and hypertension that was not reported till the first appointment with us with a blood pressure of 160/90 mmHg. Despite the current situation, the patient was also a severe smoker during pregnancy, with up to 15 cigarettes per day. In her recent blood glucose level diary, she noted poor diabetes control, with glucose levels in the range of 22 to 26 mmol/L. In the following report, we demonstrate that prenatal ultrasonography can detect this rare but important anomaly. Additionally, this case study highlights the significance of conducting a thorough ultrasonographic evaluation in mid-gestation to effectively manage pregnancies impacted by insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.