ArticleClinical epidemiology2024
Validating ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Claims Database.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- SGLT2 Inhibitors and Asthma Exacerbation Risk Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Asthma: A Target Trial Emulation.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Association Between Post-COVID-19 Herpes Zoster Reactivation and Peripheral Nervous System Disorders: Multinational Real-World Evidence from TriNetX.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Positive Predictive Values of ICD-10-CM Diagnostic Codes in Identifying Diabetic Macular Edema in Claims Data: A Multi-Institutional Study in Taiwan.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) hospitalizations: a national all ages cross-section evaluation, 2020-2024.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025Article
- Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and risk of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stage 1-3 chronic kidney disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD): in the Era of Artificial Intelligence, Causal Inference, and Data Security.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Review
- Validating ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Claims Database [Letter].Clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To validate the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in Taiwan's insurance claims database. Methods: We identified adult patients hospitalized at any Chang Gung Memorial Foundation branch hospital between January 1st, 2017, and December 31st, 2022, with ICD-10 code G61.0 in any of the five discharge diagnosis positions, indicating possible Guillain-Barré syndrome. We then validated the possible GBS diagnosis using data from electronic medical records of the identified patients, based on the diagnostic criteria established by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. We determined the positive predictive values (PPV) of various operational definitions, including the position (primary or other) where the code was recorded in the discharge diagnosis, nerve conduction study (NCS) claims, and / or specific GBS treatments. Results: The final validation cohort of 484 patients with ICD-10 code for GBS in the discharge diagnosis was found to include 368 true GBS patients. Identifying inpatients using only the ICD-10 code for GBS in any of the five positions for discharge diagnosis yielded a PPV of 76.0%. With more restrictive definitions (primary diagnosis only, or requiring additional claims for NCS and/or treatments), the PPV tended to increase, but with fewer true GBS patients identified. Using ICD-10 GBS code in the primary diagnosis plus NCS and treatment claims yielded the highest PPV (98.3%); however, 140 (38.0%) of the true GBS patients were missed using this definition. In contrast, using the ICD-10 GBS code in any position, plus claims for NCS, achieved a relatively good PPV (85.8%) with minimal loss of true GBS patients (13, ie, 3.5%). Conclusion: In Taiwan's NHI claims data, identifying true GBS patients using only the ICD-10 code yielded a PPV of 76.0%; however, adding claims for diagnostic procedure and GBS treatment increased the PPV to 98.3%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.