Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39445227›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2024

Validating ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Claims Database.

Cheng-Yang Hsieh, Po-Ting Chen, Shih-Chieh Shao, Swu-Jane Lin, Shu-Chen Liao, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheng-Yang Hsieh *Department of Neurology, Tainan Sin Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8772-4073
Po-Ting Chen *Department of Emergency Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Shih-Chieh ShaoSchool of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4867-6686
Swu-Jane LinDepartment of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-9988
Shu-Chen LiaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4766-7326
Edward Chia-Cheng LaiSchool of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5852-7652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To validate the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in Taiwan's insurance claims database. Methods: We identified adult patients hospitalized at any Chang Gung Memorial Foundation branch hospital between January 1st, 2017, and December 31st, 2022, with ICD-10 code G61.0 in any of the five discharge diagnosis positions, indicating possible Guillain-Barré syndrome. We then validated the possible GBS diagnosis using data from electronic medical records of the identified patients, based on the diagnostic criteria established by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. We determined the positive predictive values (PPV) of various operational definitions, including the position (primary or other) where the code was recorded in the discharge diagnosis, nerve conduction study (NCS) claims, and / or specific GBS treatments. Results: The final validation cohort of 484 patients with ICD-10 code for GBS in the discharge diagnosis was found to include 368 true GBS patients. Identifying inpatients using only the ICD-10 code for GBS in any of the five positions for discharge diagnosis yielded a PPV of 76.0%. With more restrictive definitions (primary diagnosis only, or requiring additional claims for NCS and/or treatments), the PPV tended to increase, but with fewer true GBS patients identified. Using ICD-10 GBS code in the primary diagnosis plus NCS and treatment claims yielded the highest PPV (98.3%); however, 140 (38.0%) of the true GBS patients were missed using this definition. In contrast, using the ICD-10 GBS code in any position, plus claims for NCS, achieved a relatively good PPV (85.8%) with minimal loss of true GBS patients (13, ie, 3.5%). Conclusion: In Taiwan's NHI claims data, identifying true GBS patients using only the ICD-10 code yielded a PPV of 76.0%; however, adding claims for diagnostic procedure and GBS treatment increased the PPV to 98.3%.

Indexed as

diagnostic codesGuillain-Barré syndromeICD-10positive predictive valuevalidation

Identifiers

PMID39445227
PMCPMC11497080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.