ArticleAEM education and training2024
"Ardor and diligence": Quantifying the faculty effort needed in emergency medicine graduate medical education.
Article in AEM education and training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Declining Performance on the Qualifying Examination: Modeling of a Potential Inflection Point in Emergency Medicine.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- "Ardor and diligence": Quantifying the faculty effort needed in emergency medicine graduate medical education.AEM education and training · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Regulatory requirements around protected faculty effort to support graduate medical education (GME) programs have changed. The amount of labor required to run a GME program is unknown. We sought to describe the work performed by program leadership and core faculty in emergency medicine (EM). Methods: We performed a prospective survey study of core faculty in EM. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire followed by quarterly time surveys, covering activities in eight domains: evaluation, teaching and education, scholarly activity, service, interview/recruitment, clinical supervision, student responsibilities, and wellness and administration. We collected data from April 2022 to March 2023. We calculated descriptive statistics and used analyses of variance (ANOVA) to assess differences by faculty role and quarter. Results: A total of 596 physicians completed the demographic questionnaire and 347 (58.2%) completed at least one quarterly time survey including 142 (41%) females, 48 (14%) program directors (PDs), 84 (24%) assistant/associate program directors (APDs), and 215 (62%) general core faculty (GCF). The mean number of hours per week spent on nonclinical education work was 60 h for PDs, 47 h for APDs, and 44 h for GCF. ANOVA found significant differences in mean hours per week and faculty role in domains of evaluation ( Conclusions: Running a residency program requires many hours of faculty work, which can vary based on faculty role and time of year. These results can inform decisions regarding faculty support.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.