ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2024
Towards non-invasive imaging through spinal-cord generated magnetic fields.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time approach to evaluate spinal cord topography of motor pool activation during gait.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Volume conductor models for magnetospinography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using Wearable MEG to Study the Neural Control of Human Stepping.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating cardiac noise correction approaches for non-invasive electrophysiology of the human spinal cord.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive imaging of the human spinal cord is a vital tool for understanding the mechanisms underlying its functions in both healthy and pathological conditions. However, non-invasive imaging presents a significant methodological challenge because the spinal cord is difficult to access with conventional neurophysiological approaches, due to its proximity to other organs and muscles, as well as the physiological movements caused by respiration, heartbeats, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow. Here, we discuss the present state and future directions of spinal cord imaging, with a focus on the estimation of current flow through magnetic field measurements. We discuss existing cryogenic (superconducting) and non-cryogenic (optically-pumped magnetometer-based, OPM) systems, and highlight their strengths and limitations for studying human spinal cord function. While significant challenges remain, particularly in source imaging and interference rejection, magnetic field-based neuroimaging offers a novel avenue for advancing research in various areas. These include sensorimotor processing, cortico-spinal interplay, brain and spinal cord plasticity during learning and recovery from injury, and pain perception. Additionally, this technology holds promise for diagnosing and optimizing the treatment of spinal cord disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.