ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Surgeons' Approach to Intraoperative Complications in Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Hernia Repair.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgeons' preferences in the management of recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A nationwide survey.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to determine the frequency of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) and how surgeons managed complications such as intraoperative bleeding, organ damage, and peritoneal injury that may develop during this procedure. Methods: The data for the study were collected through an electronic survey created using Google Forms and sent using WhatsApp in May 2024. Results: The study included 220 of 250 surgeons (88%) working in 25 healthcare centers located in different regions where the survey was distributed. Fourteen respondents with missing data were excluded from the study. The mean age of the remaining 206 participants was 39.6 (27-69) years. The rate of surgeons using laparoscopic techniques in inguinal hernia surgery was 89.3%. The method most preferred by the surgeons performing LIHR was total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair (60.9%), followed by transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair (39.1%). The surgeons preferred open procedures in patients with a history of lower abdominal surgery, those with scrotal hernia, and elderly patients. Additionally, in cases of intraoperative complications that developed at different stages of TEP, it was observed that participants mostly convert to the TAPP technique (43.5-46%), and in some cases, almost all participants continued the procedure with the same technique, i.e., TEP repair (94.6%). Conclusion: This study revealed that surgeons preferred open procedures in some specific patient groups, but they mostly preferred LIHR in the remaining cases. Young surgeons, in particular, seem more inclined to employ laparoscopic methods. In cases of intraoperative complications, most surgeons chose to continue with laparoscopic techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.