ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Inferior-Medial Approach to Laparoscopic Splenic Vessel-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Complete preservation of the splenic vessels is ideal during laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP). However, this remains challenging and time-consuming because the vessels are often deeply embedded in the pancreatic parenchyma. Herein, we introduce our inferior-medial approach to laparoscopic splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy (lap-SVPDP) and evaluate its safety and feasibility. Methods: Forty-three patients underwent LSPDP performed by a single surgeon at our institution: 26 (60.5%) lap-SVPDPs with an inferior-medial approach and 17 with the laparoscopic Warshaw technique (lap-WT). We compared the outcomes of the 2 groups. No patient undergoing lap-SVPDP required conversion to laparotomy or lap-WT. Results: Most preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups; neither the operation time nor the intraoperative blood loss differed despite the greater technical complexity of lap-SVPDP. The mean tumor size was greater in the lap-WT than the lap-SVPDP group ( Conclusion: Inferior-medial approach lap-SVPDP could be a safe and feasible technique for lap-SVPDP; neither blood loss nor operation time is increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.