ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Prediction of benign and malignant ground glass pulmonary nodules based on multi-feature fusion of attention mechanism.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fusion of Radiomics and Gated Graph Attention Network for Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Malignancy in Ground-Glass Opacity Using Multivariate Regression and Deep Learning Models: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Chest CT imaging for differentiating normal, PRISm, and COPD in comparison with pulmonary function tests.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new feature fusion algorithm to improve the classification performance of benign and malignant ground-glass nodules (GGNs) based on deep learning. Methods: We retrospectively collected 385 cases of GGNs confirmed by surgical pathology from three hospitals. We utilized 239 GGNs from Hospital 1 as the training and internal validation set, and 115 and 31 GGNs from Hospital 2 and Hospital 3, respectively, as external test sets 1 and 2. Among these GGNs, 172 were benign and 203 were malignant. First, we evaluated clinical and morphological features of GGNs at baseline chest CT and simultaneously extracted whole-lung radiomics features. Then, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and backpropagation neural networks (BPNNs) were applied to extract deep features from whole-lung CT images, clinical, morphological features, and whole-lung radiomics features separately. Finally, we integrated these four types of deep features using an attention mechanism. Multiple metrics were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of the model. Results: The deep learning model integrating clinical, morphological, radiomics and whole lung CT image features with attention mechanism (CMRI-AM) achieved the best performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.941 (95% CI: 0.898-0.972), 0.861 (95% CI: 0.823-0.882), and 0.906 (95% CI: 0.878-0.932) on the internal validation set, external test set 1, and external test set 2, respectively. The AUC differences between the CMRI-AM model and other feature combination models were statistically significant in all three groups (all p<0.05). Conclusion: Our experimental results demonstrated that (1) applying attention mechanism to fuse whole-lung CT images, radiomics features, clinical, and morphological features is feasible, (2) clinical, morphological, and radiomics features provide supplementary information for the classification of benign and malignant GGNs based on CT images, and (3) utilizing baseline whole-lung CT features to predict the benign and malignant of GGNs is an effective method. Therefore, optimizing the fusion of baseline whole-lung CT features can effectively improve the classification performance of GGNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.