Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39445062›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

From defense to offense: antimicrobial peptides as promising therapeutics for cancer.

Hadi Zare-Zardini, Elham Saberian, Andrej Jenča, Razieh Ghanipour-Meybodi, Andrej Jenča, Adriána Petrášová, Janka Jenčová

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hadi Zare-ZardiniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran.
Elham SaberianKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavel Jozef Šafárik University (UPJS LF), Kosice, Slovakia.
Andrej JenčaKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavel Jozef Šafárik University (UPJS LF), Kosice, Slovakia.
Razieh Ghanipour-MeybodiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran.
Andrej JenčaKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavel Jozef Šafárik University (UPJS LF), Kosice, Slovakia.
Adriána PetrášováKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavel Jozef Šafárik University (UPJS LF), Kosice, Slovakia.
Janka JenčováKlinika of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Akadémia Košice Bacikova, Pavel Jozef Šafárik University (UPJS LF), Kosice, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), naturally occurring components of innate immunity, are emerging as a promising new class of anticancer agents. This review explores the potential of AMPs as a novel class of anticancer agents. AMPs, naturally occurring peptides with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, exhibit several characteristics that make them attractive candidates for cancer therapy, including selectivity for cancer cells, broad-spectrum activity, and immunomodulatory effects. Analysis of a dataset of AMPs with anticancer activity reveals that their effectiveness is influenced by various structural properties, including net charge, length, Boman index, and hydrophobicity. These properties contribute to their ability to target and disrupt cancer cell membranes, interfere with intracellular processes, and modulate the immune response. The review highlights the promising potential of AMPs as a new frontier in cancer treatment, offering hope for more effective and less toxic therapies. AMPs demonstrate promising potential in cancer therapy through multiple mechanisms, including direct cytotoxicity, immune response modulation, and targeting of the tumor microenvironment, as evidenced by extensive preclinical studies in animal models showing tumor regression, metastasis inhibition, and improved survival rates. AMPs show significant potential as cancer therapeutics through their direct cytotoxicity, immune response modulation, and tumor microenvironment targeting, with promising results from preclinical studies and early-phase clinical trials. Future research should focus on optimizing AMP properties, developing novel delivery strategies, and exploring synergistic combination therapies to fully realize their potential as effective cancer treatments, while addressing challenges related to stability, delivery, and potential toxicity.

Indexed as

antimicrobial peptidescancer therapycytotoxicityimmunomodulationtumor

Identifiers

PMID39445062
PMCPMC11496142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.