ArticleCureus2024
The Effect of Thymoquinone on Acoustic Trauma-Induced Hearing Loss in Rats.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nigella Sativa and Thymoquinone for Prevention or Mitigation of Acquired Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effect of thymoquinone, an antioxidant, on hearing loss induced by acoustic trauma in rats. Material and methods This study included 32 Wistar Albino rats divided into four groups: control, acoustic trauma, thymoquinone + acoustic trauma, and thymoquinone only, with eight rats per group. The control group received 0.5 mL of corn oil intraperitoneally for 10 days. The acoustic trauma group was exposed to 100 dB white noise at 4 kHz for 16 hours. The thymoquinone + acoustic trauma group received thymoquinone (10 mg/kg) intraperitoneally for two days before acoustic trauma and eight days after acoustic trauma. The thymoquinone only group received thymoquinone (10 mg/kg) for 10 days. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured before and after treatments on days 1, 4, and 10. Results In the control group, DPOAE measurements showed no significant change over the study period. The acoustic trauma group exhibited a significant decrease in DPOAE on the first day after trauma, followed by some recovery. The thymoquinone + acoustic trauma group showed no significant decrease in DPOAE on the first day post-trauma, suggesting a protective effect. The thymoquinone only group also indicated no significant change in DPOAE measurements, suggesting that thymoquinone alone did not affect hearing function. Conclusion Thymoquinone demonstrated a protective effect against acoustic trauma-induced hearing loss in rats, as evidenced by stable DPOAE measurements post-trauma. These findings suggest that thymoquinone may help preserve hearing function by reducing oxidative stress in the cochlea. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in humans and optimize dosage and treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.