Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39445033›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Federated learning of medical concepts embedding using BEHRT.

Ofir Ben Shoham, Nadav Rappoport

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Will large language models transform clinical prediction?Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ofir Ben ShohamDepartment of Software and Information Systems Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3531-5630
Nadav RappoportDepartment of Software and Information Systems Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7218-2558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Electronic health record data is often considered sensitive medical information. Therefore, the EHR data from different medical centers often cannot be shared, making it difficult to create prediction models using multicenter EHR data, which is essential for such models' robustness and generalizability. Federated learning (FL) is an algorithmic approach that allows learning a shared model using data in multiple locations without the need to store all data in a single central place. Our study aims to evaluate an FL approach using the BEHRT model for predictive tasks on EHR data, focusing on next visit prediction. Materials and Methods: We propose an FL approach for learning medical concepts embedding. This pretrained model can be used for fine-tuning for specific downstream tasks. Our approach is based on an embedding model like BEHRT, a deep neural sequence transduction model for EHR. We train using FL, both the masked language modeling (MLM) and the next visit downstream model. Results: We demonstrate our approach on the MIMIC-IV dataset. We compare the performance of a model trained with FL to one trained on centralized data, observing a difference in average precision ranging from 0% to 3% (absolute), depending on the length of the patients' visit history. Moreover, our approach improves average precision by 4%-10% (absolute) compared to local models. In addition, we show the importance of the usage of pretrained MLM for the next visit diagnoses prediction task. Discussion and Conclusion: We find that our FL approach reaches very close to the performance of a centralized model, and it outperforms local models in terms of average precision. We also show that pretrained MLM improves the model's average precision performance in the next visit diagnoses prediction task, compared to an MLM without pretraining.

Indexed as

BERTelectronic health records (EHRs)federated learningmachine learningNLPprediction model

Identifiers

PMID39445033
PMCPMC11498200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.