ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with deep learning using inspiratory and expiratory chest computed tomography and clinical information.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Deep Learning in Diagnosing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Hybrid deep learning approach for early emphysema diagnosis combining fuzzy C-means, TransUNet, and faster mask R-CNN.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning models using dual-phase CT radiomics for early detection of PRISm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, more and more patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have remained undiagnosed despite having undergone medical examination. This study aimed to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for automatically detecting COPD using double-phase (inspiratory and expiratory) chest computed tomography (CT) images and clinical information. Methods: A total of 2,047 participants, including never-smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers, were prospectively recruited from three hospitals. The double-phase CT images and clinical information of each participant were collected for training the proposed CNN model which integrated a sequence of residual feature extracting blocks network (RFEBNet) for extracting CT image features and a fully connected feed-forward network (FCNet) for extracting clinical features. In addition, the RFEBNet utilizing double- or single-phase CT images and the FCNet using clinical information were conducted for comparison. Results: The proposed CNN model, which utilized double-phase CT images and clinical information, outperformed other models in detecting COPD with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.930 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.913-0.951] on an internal test set (n=307). The AUC was higher than the RFEBNet using double-phase CT images (AUC =0.912, 95% CI: 0.891-0.932), single inspiratory CT images (AUC =0.888, 95% CI: 0.863-0.915), single expiratory CT images (AUC =0.897, 95% CI: 0.874-0.925), and FCNet using clinical information (AUC =0.805, 95% CI: 0.777-0.841). The proposed model also achieved the best performance on an external test (n=516) with an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI: 0.871-0.931). Conclusions: The proposed CNN model using double-phase CT images and clinical information can automatically detect COPD with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.