ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Bibliometric and knowledge map analysis of one lung ventilation.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One lung ventilation (OLV) is an essential method of lung isolation to protect the ventilated lung from soiling by the contralateral lung and obtain optimal surgical exposure in thoracic surgery. This study aims to examine the trends and developments in OLV research from 1982 to 2024 through bibliometric analysis. Methods: The literature on OLV was systematically searched in the Web of Science Core Collection database for this study. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were utilized to perform comprehensive bibliometric and visual analyses of global publication/trends, countries/institutions, authors/co-cited authors, journals/co-cited journals, co-cited references, and keywords in the field of OLV. Results: A total of 1,682 articles and reviews on OLV research were identified, which showed an overall growing trend from 1982 to 2024. The United States was the leader in this field, accounting for the largest number of publications (n=299). Among all institutions, Yonsei University had the largest number of publications (n=23), but National Taiwan University Hospital had the highest number of cited publications (n=876). The papers related to OLV were mainly published in Conclusions: Through bibliometric and visualization methods, we undertook a comprehensive analysis in the field of OLV. The United States maintained a top position in this field, the emerging hotspots of OLV changed from basic research to clinical research and the further innovation of OLV management. This study provides new ideas for scholars in their future works.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.