ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
The supervisory relationship as a predictor of mental health outcomes in doctoral students in the United Kingdom.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nature human behaviour · 2026Pooled it
- Meaning Construction: Online Narratives of Supervisor-Postgraduate Relationships in Digital Communities.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The value of interdisciplinary exposure: how university disciplinary diversity shapes research productivity of PhD students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- How does supervisor support shape PhD students' learning experience? Evidence from the Nature Careers 2025 Global PhD Survey.PloS one · 2026Article
- No Thesis, No Future! Exploring the associations between research inaccessibility and suicidal ideation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Thesis advisee mistreatment and mental health: a cross-sectional study based on Structural Equation Models.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Supervisor-group culture, age and the stress-burnout mechanism: a qualitative study of Chinese doctoral students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Reconsidering the advisor-advisee relationship: Beyond the dichotomy between rigor and abuse in graduate education.EXCLI journal · 2026Article
- The mechanisms underlying the influence of perceived pressure on doctoral students' learning engagement: a serial mediation of social support and academic self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Navigating supervisory and structural challenges in phD education: a qualitative study of Iranian phD candidates' perspectives.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Protective or Pressuring? Multi-Group Structural Path Analysis of Family-School Support and Mental Health Among Postgraduates.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The process of a doctorate degree has been implicated in the onset and exacerbation of mental health problems among doctoral students. Previous studies have suggested that the student-supervisor relationship may predict emotional wellbeing and mental health outcomes in doctoral students in the UK. However, these studies were conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic and often used unstandardized measures to investigate supervisory styles. Methods: The present study was part of the Better Together project, a wellbeing initiative for doctoral students in the UK. It explored the predictive ability of aspects of the student-supervisor relationship with regards to doctoral students' mental health outcomes. The sample consisted of 141 students doing a research-based doctorate degree in the UK. The survey included demographic questions and questionnaires assessing supervisory styles, the discrepancy between actual and preferred supervisory relationship, depression, anxiety, and stress. Results: A large proportion of participants fell in the severe and extremely severe categories in the depression, anxiety, and stress sub-scales. Multiple regression analyses indicated that both supervisory styles and discrepancy significantly predicted students' mental health outcomes. More specifically, higher scores in the uncertain supervisory style, which is characterized by indecisiveness and ambiguity, were linked with higher scores in depression, anxiety, and stress. Discussion: The findings provided new insights concerning the aspects of the student-supervisor relationship that are related to the mental health issues of doctoral students in the UK. They have important implications for future research and supervision practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.