Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444789›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience insights2024

Ischemic Stroke: Pathophysiology and Evolving Treatment Approaches.

Dhriti Majumder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dhriti MajumderAlliance University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9292-6430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and disability, with ischemic stroke being the most common type. It occurs due to reduced cerebral blood flow, leading to a cascade of events initiated by oxygen and nutrient deprivation, triggering excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation and finally culminating in neuronal injury and death. Key molecular players in ischemic stroke include glutamate receptors, acid-sensing ion channels, and purinergic receptors, exacerbating cellular damage through calcium influx, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Understanding these mechanisms has shaped therapeutic strategies, such as neuroprotective agents and stem cell therapies. Current treatments such as tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) emphasize timely intervention, yet challenges persist in patient-specific variability and accessibility. This review provides an overview of ischemic stroke pathophysiology, emphasizing cellular responses to ischemia and current and future therapeutic approaches including stem cell therapies aimed at mitigating stroke-induced disabilities and improving long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

ASICion channelsIschemic strokeNMDAstroke therapy

Identifiers

PMID39444789
PMCPMC11497522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.