Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444750›Full record

ArticleOTO open

Preference Signals and Interview Invitations: Insight Into Recent Updates to the Oto-HNS Residency Application Process.

Radhika Duggal, Kyra Osborne, Alan Kominsky, William S Tierney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Otolaryngology Residency Application Trends and Match Outcomes at a Large Academic Medical Center.ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Radhika DuggalCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA.
Kyra OsborneDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio USA.
Alan KominskyDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio USA.
William S TierneyDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7371-9364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: While students in the 2023 Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Oto-HNS) residency match were allowed 7 preference signals, this number increased to 25 for the 2024 match with the goal of reducing the overall application volume. We sought to understand the impact of this change to application volume and interview patterns. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Program directors of US Oto-HNS residency programs were invited to participate in an anonymous, electronic survey. Methods: An anonymous REDCap questionnaire was sent via email to all current Oto-HNS program directors in January 2024. Data were analyzed using R Version 4.3.1. Results: Forty-four program directors completed the survey. While programs received a median [interquartile range] of 400 [363, 445] applications last year, this year they reported receiving 295 [233, 339] applications of which a median of 110 applicants (40%) signaled the program. While the median percent of applicants who were interviewed by a program was 16%, the percent of interviews among applicants who had signaled the program was 37%. Of all interviews, nearly all (median 100% [91, 100]) were of applicants who had signaled the program. Finally, 40 (91%) of program directors reported that signaling played an important role in deciding to interview a candidate. Conclusion: Preference signals play an important role in a residency program's decision to interview a candidate. Our findings suggest that the implementation of preference signals successfully decreased the average number of applications received by each program and that medical students applying to more programs than available signals may experience diminishing returns.

Indexed as

medical schoolotolaryngologyresearchresidency applicationresidents

Identifiers

PMID39444750
PMCPMC11496986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.