Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444729›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Addressing abdominal trauma from conflict and warfare in under-resourced regions: A critical narrative review.

Wireko Andrew Awuah, Joecelyn Kirani Tan, Muhammad Hamza Shah, Arjun Ahluwalia, Sakshi Roy, Syed Hasham Ali, Tomas Ferreira, Hareesha Rishab Bharadwaj, Favour Tope Adebusoye, Nicholas Aderinto and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wireko Andrew AwuahFaculty of Medicine Sumy State University Sumy Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0003-2380-2949
Joecelyn Kirani TanFaculty of Medicine University of St Andrews St. Andrews Scotland UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3648-6553
Muhammad Hamza ShahSchool of Medicine Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6782-730X
Arjun AhluwaliaSchool of Medicine Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2466-6865
Sakshi RoySchool of Medicine Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK.
Syed Hasham AliFaculty of Medicine, Dow Medical College Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi Pakistan.
Tomas FerreiraBristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK.
Hareesha Rishab BharadwajFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health The University of Manchester Manchester UK.
Favour Tope AdebusoyeFaculty of Medicine Sumy State University Sumy Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-3920
Nicholas AderintoDepartment of Internal Medicine LAUTECH Teaching Hospital Oyo Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-0004-7389
Adele MazzoleniFaculty of Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry UK.
Toufik Abdul-RahmanFaculty of Medicine Sumy State University Sumy Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0003-0153-287X
Denys OvechkinFaculty of Medicine Sumy State University Sumy Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of abdominal injuries in war and conflict zones, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), presents a significant healthcare challenge. These injuries, often resulting from explosive devices, firearms, and shrapnel, lead to high morbidity and mortality rates due to delayed diagnoses, inadequate medical infrastructure, and limited access to specialised care. This review aims to summarise the literature on conflict-related abdominal injuries in LMICs, highlighting the impact of such trauma on healthcare systems and patient outcomes, and suggesting strategies for improvement. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, focusing on studies from contemporary and historical conflict-ridden nations. Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched using specific keywords. Inclusion criteria encompassed various study designs and both paediatric and adult populations, with studies providing raw data prioritised. Exclusions included non-English articles, non-peer-reviewed studies, and those not reporting outcomes or involving high-income countries. Results: The review identified significant challenges in managing war-related abdominal trauma in LMICs, including a shortage of healthcare personnel and infrastructure, socio-political barriers, and research gaps. Clinical implications of such injuries include elevated mortality rates, with surgical and nonsurgical management outcomes varying significantly. Positive advancements in diagnostics and surgical techniques have improved survival rates, yet the need for further infrastructural and workforce enhancements remains critical. Conclusion: Abdominal trauma in conflict-affected LMICs necessitates focused efforts to improve healthcare delivery, including targeted funding for infrastructure and equipment, development of training programs for trauma specialists, and increased humanitarian aid. Bridging research gaps and fostering collaborative efforts are essential for advancing the management of abdominal trauma and enhancing patient outcomes in these challenging environments.

Indexed as

abdominal surgeryabdominal traumaconflictemergency careGlobal surgerylow and middle‐income countries

Identifiers

PMID39444729
PMCPMC11497492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.