Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444719›Full record

ArticleRevista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)

Perception

Diego Alonso Huayta-Garcia, Kilder Maynor Carranza-Samanez, Julissa Amparo Dulanto-Vargas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diego Alonso Huayta-GarciaSchool of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú. 100030107@cientifica.edu.pe Universidad Científica del Sur School of Dentistry Universidad Científica del Sur Lima Peru 100030107@cientifica.edu.pe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0816-2621
Kilder Maynor Carranza-SamanezResearch Group in Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú. kcarranza@cientifica.edu.pe, jdulanto@cientifica.edu.pe Universidad Científica del Sur Research Group in Dental Sciences School of Dentistry Universidad Científica del Sur Lima Peru kcarranza@cientifica.edu.pe jdulanto@cientifica.edu.pe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6891-0065
Julissa Amparo Dulanto-VargasResearch Group in Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú. kcarranza@cientifica.edu.pe, jdulanto@cientifica.edu.pe Universidad Científica del Sur Research Group in Dental Sciences School of Dentistry Universidad Científica del Sur Lima Peru kcarranza@cientifica.edu.pe jdulanto@cientifica.edu.pe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-3853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Orthodontists' perception of bracket techniques plays a significant role in planning, allowing critical evaluation of the patient's facial aesthetics. Objective: To compare the perception of Peruvian orthodontists regarding treatments with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Methods: A questionnaire was applied to 168 orthodontic specialists (53% men, average professional experience 9 years) to evaluate preferences for treatment phases, benefits of patient consultation according to the type of bracket, experience with self-ligating brackets, and demographic and clinical characteristics (sex, years of experience, volume of care and length of experience). The Kruskal-Wallis Test and Chi-square test were used with P < 0.05. Results: The total preference for self-ligating brackets (48.9%) was higher than conventional brackets (18.8%). Self-ligating brackets were preferred in most treatment phases (46.4%-63.7%) but not in completion and finishing, in which conventional brackets were preferred. Most orthodontists preferred self-ligating brackets (40.5%-60.7%) over conventional brackets (4.2%-14.3%) due to patient comfort, oral hygiene, and total treatment and appointment time control, but not the cost. The orthodontists reported SLB having mastered their technique in <10 cases (59.5%), the experience of <2 years (45.2%), applying control times of 4-9 weeks (78.6%), and feeling comfortable with their use (89.3%). Preferences were not associated with sex ( Conclusions: Peruvian orthodontists preferred self-ligating brackets over conventional brackets in most treatment phases associated with user comfort and oral hygiene management and treatment/control time, and professional experience. However, some factors, such as cost-effectiveness, counteracted this preference.

Indexed as

orthodontic bracketsorthodontistsperception

Identifiers

PMID39444719
PMCPMC11495169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.