Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444707›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Implementation of a remote symptom monitoring pathway in oncology care: analysis of real-world experience across 33 cancer centres in France and Belgium.

Maria Alice Franzoi, Arlindo R Ferreira, Antoine Lemaire, Joseph Rodriguez, Jessica Grosjean, Joana M Ribeiro, Laura Polastro, Thomas Grellety, Xavier Artignan, Katell Le Du and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07597590 (Feasibility of a Structured Digital Patient-Reported Assessment Pathway in Older Adults With Acute Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07597590 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a Structured Digital Patient-Reported Assessment Pathway in Older Adults With Acute Leukemia: A Prospective Single-Center Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación para la Investigación Biosanitaria del Principado de AsturiasRan2026 to 2028Enrolled20ConditionsLeukemia Acute Myeloid, Leukemia Acute Lymphoid Leukemia (ALL)ArmsDigital Patient-Reported Assessment Pathway
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Feasibility of clinical implementation and acceptability of patient-reported screening for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Beyond one-time PROMs: high-frequency single-item mobile ePROM tracking of postoperative recovery in spine surgery-a prospective feasibility study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Telehealth education alone is not enough: toward closed-loop supportive oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Barriers and enablers for health system reform.Frontiers in health services · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Maria Alice FranzoiBreast Cancer Survivorship Group, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Arlindo R FerreiraResilience, Paris, France.
Antoine LemaireCentre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France.
Joseph RodriguezCentre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France.
Jessica GrosjeanCenter Cancer Les Dentellières- Elsan, Valenciennes, France.
Joana M RibeiroBreast Cancer Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Laura PolastroInstitute Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
Thomas GrelletyCentre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque, Bayonne, France.
Xavier ArtignanInstitut de Cancérologie et Radiothérapie Brétillien, Rennes, France.
Katell Le DuHôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France.
Martina PagliucaBreast Cancer Survivorship Group, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Élodie NouhaudResilience, Paris, France.
Maximilien AuthemanResilience, Paris, France.
Fabrice AndréBreast Cancer Survivorship Group, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Ethan BaschUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Otto MetzgerDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Charles FertéResilience, Paris, France.
Mario Di PalmaInterdisciplinary Department for the Organization of Patient Pathways - DIOPP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Florian ScottéInterdisciplinary Department for the Organization of Patient Pathways - DIOPP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Ines Vaz-LuisBreast Cancer Survivorship Group, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) of symptoms using electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) has been shown to reduce symptom burden and hospitalizations, increase dose intensity and improve quality of life of patients during systemic therapy being recommended by international guidelines in routine oncology practice. However, implementation in routine care has been slow and faces several challenges. In this study we report on the real-world multi-center implementation of a RPM pathway encompassing weekly patient symptom ePRO reporting with electronic alert notifications triggered to providers for severe or worsening symptoms. Methods: An RPM pathway was implemented in 33 European cancer centers in France and Belgium between November 2021 and August 2023. The implementation process followed a standardized phasic process of Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment. Patient-level and system-level implementation metrics were collected and evaluated according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Findings: Across the 33 cancer centers, the RPM pathway was implemented for 3015 patients cared for by 168 providers. The RPM pathway enabled effective and timely symptom management with 94.6% of all alerts (10,132/10,711) evolving to an improvement two weeks later, among which 88.4% (9468/10,711) showed ≥2 grades of improvement on the 5-point scale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology (PRO-CTCAE). The median time to alert management by the care team was 13 h 41 min (25th percentile: 1 h 42 min, 75th percentile: 1 day + 19 h 54 min), with 80% (36,269/45,334) of alerts managed by a nurse navigator telephone call. Patient adherence with weekly ePRO reporting was 82% (2472/3015). In an experience survey, 87% (32/38) of providers were satisfied with integrating the solution into their organization and 90% (276/307) of the patients felt that ePRO reporting positively impacted their care. As of March 2024, the pathway has been maintained in all participating centers, with activation of an additional 18 centers following data lock, and reimbursement for this RPM pathway approved in France in October 2023. Interpretation: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of implementing and maintaining an RPM pathway during routine care across a diverse group of cancer centers in the European setting, with high levels of patient and provider engagement, and positive clinical impact. Funding: Part of this work was funded Breast Cancer Research Foundation (Career Development Award to Maria Alice Franzoi) and Resilience (nurse navigation and technology support).

Indexed as

Digital healthePROsImplementation scienceNurse navigationOncology care deliveryRE-AIM frameworkRemote symptom monitoringRoutine care

Identifiers

PMID39444707
PMCPMC11496975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.