Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444664›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Beyond the stereotypes: Artificial Intelligence image generation and diversity in anesthesiology.

Mia Gisselbaek, Laurens Minsart, Ekin Köselerli, Mélanie Suppan, Basak Ceyda Meco, Laurence Seidel, Adelin Albert, Odmara L Barreto Chang, Sarah Saxena, Joana Berger-Estilita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mia GisselbaekDivision of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laurens MinsartDepartment of Anesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Ekin KöselerliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, University of Ankara School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Mélanie SuppanDivision of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Basak Ceyda MecoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, University of Ankara School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Laurence SeidelB-STAT, Biostatistics and Research Method Center of ULiège and CHU of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Adelin AlbertB-STAT, Biostatistics and Research Method Center of ULiège and CHU of Liège, Liege, Belgium.
Odmara L Barreto ChangDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Sarah SaxenaDepartment of Anesthesia and Reanimation, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium.
Joana Berger-EstilitaInstitute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into anesthesiology to enhance patient safety, improve efficiency, and streamline various aspects of practice. Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether AI-generated images accurately depict the demographic racial and ethnic diversity observed in the Anesthesia workforce and to identify inherent social biases in these images. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis was conducted from January to February 2024. Demographic data were collected from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC). Two AI text-to-image models, ChatGPT DALL-E 2 and Midjourney, generated images of anesthesiologists across various subspecialties. Three independent reviewers assessed and categorized each image based on sex, race/ethnicity, age, and emotional traits. Results: A total of 1,200 images were analyzed. We found significant discrepancies between AI-generated images and actual demographic data. The models predominantly portrayed anesthesiologists as White, with ChatGPT DALL-E2 at 64.2% and Midjourney at 83.0%. Moreover, male gender was highly associated with White ethnicity by ChatGPT DALL-E2 (79.1%) and with non-White ethnicity by Midjourney (87%). Age distribution also varied significantly, with younger anesthesiologists underrepresented. The analysis also revealed predominant traits such as "masculine, ""attractive, "and "trustworthy" across various subspecialties. Conclusion: AI models exhibited notable biases in gender, race/ethnicity, and age representation, failing to reflect the actual diversity within the anesthesiologist workforce. These biases highlight the need for more diverse training datasets and strategies to mitigate bias in AI-generated images to ensure accurate and inclusive representations in the medical field.

Indexed as

anesthesiologyArtificial Intelligencebiasesgender equityrace/ethnicitystereotypes

Identifiers

PMID39444664
PMCPMC11497631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.