ArticleNeurology. Genetics2024
Fetal Brain MRI Findings in Myotonic Dystrophy and Considerations for Prenatal Genetic Testing.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myotonia: Recognition, Evaluation, and Differential Diagnosis.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
- Fetal magnetic resonance imaging features of syndromic megalencephaly: a systematic review of imaging-genotype associations.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Neonatal neurocritical care considerations for prenatally identified neurological disorders.Pediatric research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a rare congenital neuromuscular disorder associated with high morbidity and potential early mortality requiring lifelong symptomatic management. Prenatal presentations of DM1 have been associated with nonspecific ultrasound findings such as clubbed foot, polyhydramnios, ventriculomegaly, and decreased fetal movement, but many cases of DM1 have no ultrasound anomalies. Methods: We sought to compare the clinical course and prenatal imaging findings in two cases of DM1 using retrospective chart review. Results: This report demonstrates potential expansion of the prenatal phenotype of DM1 including fetal SVT and frontal bossing. Both cases shared unique prenatal imaging features of lateral ventricle dilation involving the anterior bodies and frontal horns on fetal MRI. Discussion: Because congenital DM1 is most often maternally inherited, attention to maternal symptoms, physical examination, and family history can be helpful in recognizing cases. Molecular diagnosis of DM1 requires specialized testing of the 3' untranslated region of the DMPK gene, and DM1 will not be detected by current standard prenatal genetic testing with microarray, karyotype, or exome sequencing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.