ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Quality of Life in Adult Female Acne Treated with Azelaic Acid 15% Gel versus Oral Spironolactone.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cosmeceuticals in acne vulgaris: from mechanism of action to clinical application.Skin health and disease · 2026Review
- Oral and Topical Spironolactone in Adult Female Acne: A Narrative Review Comparing Systemic and Local Approaches.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Review
- A Review and Survey of Local Eastern Kentucky Medicinal Plants and Their Pharmacological Benefits.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In several countries, recent research has shown an increase in the prevalence of adult female acne (AFA), defined as the acne that appears in women aged over 25. This disease brings some particularities and challenges, such as a greater impact on quality of life (QoL) and chronicity. A negative impact on QoL has been observed, as well as anxiety, depression, anger, low self-esteem, and feelings of embarrassment and frustration. Purpose: To quantify AFA's impact on QoL and the influence of two dermatological treatments. Material and Methods: A prospective study including 40 women, aging from 25 to 44 years old, with mild-to-moderate acne was conducted. Participants underwent clinical, laboratory, and photographic evaluations. They were randomized into two treatment groups: group 1 - azelaic acid (AZA) 15% gel twice daily; group 2 - spironolactone (SPIRO) 100 mg/day and treated for 6 months. At baseline and at the end of treatments, a specific QoL questionnaire for acne, already translated and validated for Brazilian Portuguese (Acne-QoL-BR), was applied. It contains 19 questions allotted in four domains. Each item within a domain is scored from 0 to 6. The total score ranges from 0 to 114 and domains are distributed as follows: 0-30 (self-perception), 0-30 (role-emotional), 0-24 (role-social), 0-30 (acne-symptoms). Higher scores reflect better QoL. Results: The mean age was 32.7 (SD: 5.42); 85% presented persistent acne. After treatment regardless of group, there was a significant improvement in total score and all domains' scores of acne QoL-BR (p < 0.001), with no difference between groups, despite one treatment being topical and the other systemic (p=0.918). Conclusion: Acne-QoL-BR is a useful tool for quantifying the impact of acne and should be used as an efficacy parameter in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.