Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444597›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2024

Association of the belief in conspiracy narratives with vaccination status and recommendation behaviours of German physicians.

Frederike Taubert, Philipp Schmid, Dawn Holford, Pierre Verger, Angelo Fasce, Linda C Karlsson, Anna Soveri, Stephan Lewandowsky, Cornelia Betsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vaccination Readiness and Conspiracy Beliefs to Virus-Based Diseases: A Validation Study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Frederike TaubertInstitute for Planetary Health Behavior, Health Communication, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Straße 63, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.
Philipp SchmidInstitute for Planetary Health Behavior, Health Communication, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Straße 63, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.
Dawn HolfordSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, United Kingdom.
Pierre VergerSoutheastern France Health Regional Observatory (ORS PACA), Faculty of Medicine, 2 Place Le Verrier, 13004 Marseille, France.
Angelo FasceSoutheastern Health Regional Observatory (ORS PACA), 13004 Marseille, France.
Linda C KarlssonDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
Anna SoveriDepartment of Psychology, Åbo Akademi University, Tehtaankatu 2, 20500 Turku, Finland.
Stephan LewandowskySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, United Kingdom.
Cornelia BetschInstitute for Planetary Health Behavior, Health Communication, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Straße 63, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy has been identified as one of the top ten threats to global health by the World Health Organization (WHO). The belief in conspiracy narratives is repeatedly discussed as a major driver of vaccine hesitancy among the general population. However, there is a lack of research investigating the role of the belief in conspiracy narratives in vaccination decisions and recommendation behaviours of physicians. This is particularly relevant as physicians are one of the major and trusted sources of information for patients' vaccination decisions. This study therefore investigated the association between believing in COVID-19-related conspiracy narratives and physicians' own COVID-19 vaccination status and their recommendation behavior for COVID-19 and other vaccines (e.g., HPV or flu). In a cross-sectional survey among German physicians (N = 602, April 2022) two conspiracy narratives were assessed, stating that the coronavirus is a hoax or that it is human-made. Additional control variables included trust in health institutions, the rejection of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination (confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, and collective responsibility) and demographic variables. Hierarchical regressions indicated that greater belief in the conspiracy narrative claiming that the coronavirus is a hoax was associated with lower COVID-19 vaccination uptake and fewer COVID-19 vaccination recommendations among physicians. The results for recommendation behavior remain robust even when controlling for other variables. Contrary to our assumption, believing that the coronavirus is human-made was not related to vaccination status nor vaccine recommendation behavior. In conclusion, believing in conspiracy narratives that question the existence and thus also the danger of the virus is an important independent predictor of vaccine hesitancy among physicians that should be addressed in future public health interventions.

Indexed as

Conspiracy theoriesCOVID-19PhysiciansRecommendationsTrustVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39444597
PMCPMC11497475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.