ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
An Eleven-Year Retrospective Survey of Anaerobic Bloodstream Infection in Adults in a General Hospital.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Epidemiologic Characteristics of Anaerobic Bacteria Originating from Blood Cultures: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Current landscape and challenges in anaerobic bloodstream infections: epidemiology, microbiology, and clinical management.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: During conditions accompanied by the disruption of normal mucosal barriers, anaerobic bacteria, which a part of normal human mucosal microflora, may cause various infections. In this study, clinical features of anaerobic bloodstream infections (BSI) in a general hospital in China were investigated. Methods: Patients with anaerobic BSI were retrospectively enrolled between 2012 and 2022. Demographic data, clinical manifestations, antibiotic treatments, and disease outcomes were analyzed. Results: In total, 391 anaerobic bacterial strains were isolated from 381 patients aged older than 11 years of age. Given that medical records of 47 patients were missing, 334 patients were included in the clinical investigation. Patients with anaerobic BSI included in the study were predominantly older than 50 years of age. Intra-abdominal infections were the most common source of anaerobic BSI (59%), followed by those of the female genital tract (10.2%) and lower respiratory tract (7.2%). Among the isolates, Conclusion: The detection rate of anaerobic BSI in Ningxia, China, remained relatively stable from 2012 to 2022. These results provide a reference for the diagnosis and empirical treatment of anaerobic BSI in this region of China. Continuous mul-ticenter studies should be conducted to monitor the incidence of anaerobic BSI and drug resistance of anaerobic isolates to improve the treatment outcomes of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.