ReviewThe Japanese dental science review2024
Treatment strategies for dental implant removal: A literature review.
Review in The Japanese dental science review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dental implant failure and retrieval techniques; a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Distinct Structural Determinants of Failure in Morse Taper and Internal Hex Implant Systems.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Implant Apicoectomy as a Minimally Invasive Alternative to Explantation in Retrograde Peri-Implantitis: A Case Report with a 12-Month Clinical and Radiological Follow-Up.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Management of Advanced Peri-Implantitis with Staged Explantation and Delayed Re-Implantation in the Esthetic Zone.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- To Remove or Not Remove Non-Conventional Dental Implants? Eleven-Year Retrospective Study on Implant Outcomes.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2026Article
- Amoxicillin and metronidazole resistance of bacteria isolated from dental implants with peri-implant diseases: a pilot cross-sectional study.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- Heat generation and histological analysis of peri-implant bone cutting using piezoelectric surgery for implant removal: an in vitro study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental implants have been widely used with success, but long-term usage sometimes leads to implant loss. The purpose of this review was to summarize the etiology of early and late failure requiring dental implant removal and the treatment strategies for the removal of failed implants and reimplantation. Early failures are often caused by patient-related factors, such as smoking, diabetes, radiotherapy, bone quality, and periodontitis of the remaining natural teeth. The most common cause of late failure is peri-implantitis, followed by implant fracture and implant malpositioning. Implants should be removed if they are mobile or if their superstructure cannot be maintained (e.g., implant fracture). For peri-implantitis, implant removal should be determined based on the patient's age and esthetic needs, the implant site, and the severity of bone loss. Many reports have been published on implant removal techniques. The reverse torque technique should always be the first choice because of its low invasiveness. The weighted survival rate for the replacement of failed implants is 86.3%, with a much lower survival rate after the second or subsequent implantations. Therefore, patient-specific problems, such as smoking habits and bruxism, should be checked before reimplantation and controlled to the greatest extent possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.