ArticleHeliyon2024
MIDC: Medical image dataset cleaning framework based on deep learning.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress in medical imaging for intracranial aneurysms: technological advances in diagnosis, management, and clinical integration.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning technology is widely used in the field of medical imaging. Among them, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are the most widely used, and the quality of the dataset is crucial for the training of CNN diagnostic models, as mislabeled data can easily affect the accuracy of the diagnostic models. However, due to medical specialization, it is difficult for non-professional physicians to judge mislabeled medical image data. In this paper, we proposed a new framework named medical image dataset cleaning (MIDC), whose main contribution is to improve the quality of public datasets by automatically cleaning up mislabeled data. The main innovations of MIDC are: firstly, the framework innovatively utilizes multiple public datasets of the same disease, relying on different CNNs to automatically recognize images and remove mislabeled data to complete the data cleaning process. This process does not rely on annotations from professional physicians and does not require additional datasets with more reliable labels; Secondly, a novel grading rule is designed to divide the datasets into high-accuracy datasets and low-accuracy datasets, based on which the data cleaning process can be performed; Thirdly, a novel data cleaning module based on CNN is designed to identify and clean low-accuracy datasets by using high-accuracy datasets. In the experiments, the validity of the proposed framework was verified by using four kinds of datasets diabetic retinal, viral pneumonia, breast tumor, and skin cancer, with results showing an increase in the average diagnostic accuracy from 71.18 % to 85.13 %, 82.50 %to 93.79 %, 85.59 %to 93.45 %, and 84.55 %to 94.21 %, respectively. The proposed data cleaning framework MIDC could better help physicians diagnose diseases based on the dataset with mislabeled data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.