Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39444305›Full record

SynthesisWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Comparing mechanical and enzymatic isolation procedures to isolate adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction: A systematic review.

Mustafa Uguten, Nanouk van der Sluis, Linda Vriend, J H Coert, Martin C Harmsen, Berend van der Lei, Joris A van Dongen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparing mechanical and enzymatic isolation procedures to isolate adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction: A systematic review.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Clinical Applications of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Stromal Vascular Matrix for Osteoarthritis: A Commentary.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Therapeutic potential of adipose tissue in aesthetic medicine.World journal of experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mustafa Uguten *Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-2560-769X
Nanouk van der Sluis *Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5336-1967
Linda VriendDepartment of Pathology & Medical Biology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9439-5810
J H CoertDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martin C HarmsenDepartment of Pathology & Medical Biology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Berend van der LeiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joris A van DongenDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue has gained popularity as regenerative therapy for tissue repair. Both enzymatic and mechanical intraoperative SVF isolation procedures exist. To date, the quest for the preferred isolation procedure persists, due to the absence of standardised yield measurements and a defined clinical threshold. This systematic review is an update of the systematic review published in 2018, where guidelines were proposed to improve and standardise SVF isolation procedures. An elaborate data search in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from September 2016 to date. A total of 26 full-text articles met inclusion criteria, evaluating 33 isolation procedures (11 enzymatic and 22 mechanical). In general, enzymatic and mechanical SVF isolation procedures yield comparable outcomes concerning cell yield (2.3-18.0 × 10

Indexed as

Adipose TissueStromal Vascular FractionCell SeparationHumansadipose stromal cellsclinical grade stromal vascular fractionenzymatic isolationlipoaspiratelipograftingmechanical isolationstromal vascular fraction

Identifiers

PMID39444305
PMCPMC11584359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.