ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Establishing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic framework for aldehyde oxidase and dual aldehyde oxidase-CYP substrates.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic framework for aldehyde oxidase and dual aldehyde oxidase-CYP substrates.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aldehyde oxidase (AO) contributes to the clearance of many approved and investigational small molecule drugs, which are often dual substrates of AO and drug-metabolizing enzymes such as cytochrome P450s (CYPs). As such, the lack of established framework for quantitative translation of the clinical pharmacologic correlates of AO-mediated clearance represents an unmet need. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling in the development of AO and dual AO-CYP substrates. PBPK models were developed for capmatinib, idelalisib, lenvatinib, zaleplon, ziprasidone, and zoniporide, incorporating in vitro functional data from human liver subcellular fractions and human hepatocytes. Prediction of metabolic elimination with/without the additional empirical scaling factors (ESFs) was assessed. Clinical pharmacokinetics, human mass balance, and drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies with CYP3A4 modulators, where available, were used to refine/verify the models. Due to the lack of clinically significant AO-DDIs with known AO inhibitors, the fraction metabolized by AO (fm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.