ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024
Change in Femoral Offset after Closed Reduction and Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis Via Lateral Approach in Patients with Medial Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveClosed reduction and dynamic hip screw (DHS) osteosynthesis are preferred as joint-preserving therapy in case of medial femoral neck fractures (MFNFs). A change in the femoral offset (CFO) can cause gait abnormality, impingement, or greater trochanteric pain syndrome. It is unknown whether the femoral offset (FO) can be postoperatively fully restored. The aim of the study was to investigate the extent of a possible CFO in hip joints after DHS osteosynthesis in the case of an MFNF.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 104 patients (mean age: 71.02 years, men: n = 50, women: n = 54) with MFNF who underwent closed reduction and DHS osteosynthesis were analyzed by postoperative x-rays to assess CFO between the operated (OS) and nonoperated joint side (NOS). The studies covered the time period 2010-2020. A statistical comparison was performed between the mean values of FO between OS and NOS, taking into account patient age, gender, and fracture severity.
resultsAll operated hip joints showed a CFO. In 76.0% (79 of 104), the FO decreased (FOD), and in 24.0% (25 of 104), the FO increased (FOI). A critical CFO (>15% CFO) was detected in 52.9% (55 of 104). In hip joints with postoperative FOD, the mean FO between NOS (49.15 mm [±6.56]) and OS (39.32 mm [±7.87]) and in hip joints with postoperative FOI the mean FO between NOS (41.59 [±8.21]) and OS (47.27 [±6.68]) differed significantly (p < 0.001). Preoperative FO (r
conclusionClosed reduction and DHS osteosynthesis in patients with MFNF result in a clustered significant CFO. The individual FO should be taken into account pre- and intraoperatively to avoid a postoperative extensive CFO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.