ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2024
Cell-nanoparticle stickiness and dose delivery in a multi-model in silico platform: DosiGUI.
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hazard screening of colloidal silica nanomaterials with varying degrees of silane surface functionalization: a safe-by-design case study.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2025Article
- The nano-paradox: addressing nanotoxicity for sustainable agriculture, circular economy and SDGs.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is well-known that nanoparticles sediment, diffuse and aggregate when dispersed in a fluid. Once they approach a cell monolayer, depending on the affinity or "stickiness" between cells and nanoparticles, they may adsorb instantaneously, settle slowly - in a time- and concentration-dependent manner - or even encounter steric hindrance and rebound. Therefore, the dose perceived by cells in culture may not necessarily be that initially administered. Methods for quantifying delivered dose are difficult to implement, as they require precise characterization of nanoparticles and exposure scenarios, as well as complex mathematical operations to handle the equations governing the system dynamics. Here we present a pipeline and a graphical user interface, DosiGUI, for application to the accurate nano-dosimetry of engineered nanoparticles on cell monolayers, which also includes methods for determining the parameters characterising nanoparticle-cell stickiness.
resultsWe evaluated the stickiness for 3 industrial nanoparticles (TiO
conclusionAccurate nanoparticle dose estimation in vitro is crucial for in vivo extrapolation, allowing for their safe use in medical and other applications. This study provides a computational platform - DosiGUI - for more reliable dose-response characterization. It also highlights the importance of cell-nanoparticle stickiness for better risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.