ArticleRespiratory research2024
Clustering-aided prediction of outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01915511 (Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Prospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO) and Interstitial Lung Disease Prospective Outcomes (IPF-PRO/ILD-PRO) Registry
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- S-palmitoylation-related genes in Crohn's disease: Bioinformatic identification and validation.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Mass spectrometry-based peripheral blood proteomics for biomarker discovery in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood biomarkers predictive of the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) would be of value for research and clinical practice. We used data from the IPF-PRO Registry to investigate whether the addition of "omics" data to risk prediction models based on demographic and clinical characteristics improved prediction of the progression of IPF.
methodsThe IPF-PRO Registry enrolled patients with IPF at 46 sites across the US. Patients were followed prospectively. Median follow-up was 27.2 months. Prediction models for disease progression included omics data (proteins and microRNAs [miRNAs]), demographic factors and clinical factors, all assessed at enrollment. Data on proteins and miRNAs were included in the models either as raw values or based on clusters in various combinations. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) Cox regression was applied for time-to-event composite outcomes and logistic regression with L1 penalty was applied for binary outcomes assessed at 1 year. Model performance was assessed using Harrell's C-index (for time-to-event outcomes) or area under the curve (for binary outcomes).
resultsData were analyzed from 231 patients. The models based on demographic and clinical factors, with or without omics data, were the top-performing models for prediction of all the time-to-event outcomes. Relative changes in average C-index after incorporating omics data into models based on demographic and clinical factors ranged from 1.7 to 3.2%. Of the blood biomarkers, surfactant protein-D, serine protease inhibitor A7 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) were among the top predictors of the outcomes. For the binary outcomes, models based on demographics alone and models based on demographics plus omics data had similar performances. Of the blood biomarkers, CC motif chemokine 11, vascular cell adhesion protein-1, adiponectin, carcinoembryonic antigen and MMP-9 were the most important predictors of the binary outcomes.
conclusionsWe identified circulating protein and miRNA biomarkers associated with the progression of IPF. However, the integration of omics data into prediction models that included demographic and clinical factors did not materially improve the performance of the models.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; No: NCT01915511; registered August 5, 2013; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.