ArticleBMC surgery2024
A case-series study of hepatic left lateral segment inversion for surgical field exposure in laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRetraction of the hepatic left lateral segment (HLLS) is a crucial maneuver for surgical field exposure during laparoscopic gastrectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy. Though various methods of retraction are available, there is no perfect solution. Here, we report the results of our initial 42 cases with HLLS inversion method and discuss the feasibility, safety, effectiveness and technical aspects of this method.
methodsThe intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes of 42 patients who underwent HLLS inversion during laparoscopic total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy in our department September, 2023 to January, 2024 were reviewed. HLLS inversion was performed by mobilizing the HLLS and inverting it to the right supra-hepatic space through an incision at the falciform ligament.
results42 patients underwent HLLS inversion successfully with an average time of 13.9 min. 7 patients needed re-inversion due to slipping back of the HLLS during operation. Optimal exposure of the surgical field was achieved in all patients. No intra-operative complications occurred, except for 1 patient presented with mild intraoperative hepatic hemorrhage requiring electrocoagulation for hemostasis. Alanine aminotransferase and glutamine aminotransferase elevated in some patients on postoperative day 1(POD1), but declined to preoperative levels on the 7th postoperative day. There were no Clavien-Dindo II grade or higher digestive complications after surgery. In 5 patients with preservation the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve, the contractile function of the gall bladder was intact or slightly impaired 2 weeks after operation.
conclusionFor laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), HLLS inversion is a feasible method for optimizing visualization of the surgical field with preservation of the function of the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve. It is safe and acceptable as to the manipulation time. Re-inversion is easy and effective even in case of failure of inversion. HLLS inversion seems to be a promising technique for retraction of the liver during laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.