ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024
Safety and risk analysis of total resection surgery for thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors: a decadal analysis of 103 cases.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To explore the complications and risk factors for total resection (TR) of primary thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors over the past decade at our institution.
methodsPatients meeting inclusion criteria (primary spinal tumors, thoracic or lumbar location, TR at our center) were included. Demographic characteristics, surgical data, perioperative complications and management results were reviewed. Patients were stratified by tumor site, the number of excised segments, and recurrence status to elucidate distinctive characteristics.
resultsThe cohort comprised 103 patients, with a mean age of 35.8 years. On average, 1.83 vertebral segments were resected per patient. Perioperative complications were substantial, totaling 166 events, with 71 classified as major and 95 as minor, yielding an average of 1.61 complications per patient. No perioperative deaths occurred, but 79 patients (76.7%) experienced at least one complication. Multiple vertebral sections correlated with a higher complication rate (P = 0.031), and lumbar surgeries exhibited elevated risks of large vascular injury (P = 0.001), neurological deterioration, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage compared to thoracic cases. Conversely, thoracic spinal procedures showed a higher rate of pleural effusion (P = 0.004). Binary logistics stepwise regression identified multi-segmental resection as the independent risk factor for major perioperative complications.
conclusionsTR of primary spinal tumors is associated with a high perioperative complication rate, although most events have a favorable prognosis. Complication characteristics vary based on the surgical site, number of excised segments, and surgical history. A nuanced preoperative evaluating approach considering patient age, surgical segments, and extent of resection is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.