ArticleBMC microbiology2024
Dynamics of fermentation quality, bacterial communities, and fermentation weight loss during fermentation of sweet sorghum silage.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of wilting and additives on fermentation characteristics, microbial composition, metabolome, and ruminal degradation properties of mulberry silage.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Effects of Silage Inoculants on the Quality and Microbial Community of Whole-Plant Corn Silage Under Different Fertilization Treatments.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Low-temperature two-stage probiotic fermentation enhances nutrition and safety of pig liquid feed.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Mechanistic insights into fungal succession mediated by Pichia kudriavzevii during aerobic deterioration of ensiled total mixed ration.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Heterofermentative Lactic Acid Bacteria Enhance the Aerobic Stability of Sweet Sorghum Silage.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Dynamics of Microorganisms and Metabolites in the Mixed Silage of Oats and Vetch in Alpine Pastures, and Their Regulatory Mechanisms Under Low Temperatures.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSweet sorghum is used mainly as an energy crop and feed crop in arid and semiarid regions, and ensiling is a satisfactory method for preserving high-quality sweet sorghum. The aim of this study was to reveal the dynamics of the fermentation quality, bacterial communities, and fermentation weight loss (FWL) of sweet sorghum silage during fermentation.
methodsSweet sorghum was harvested at the first inflorescence spikelet stage and ensiled without (CK) or with lactic acid bacterial (LAB) additives (L). After ensiling, samples were collected on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 15, 40, and 100 to assess the fermentation quality, bacterial communities, and FWL.
resultsFor CK and L, on day 1, the pH was 5.77 and 5.57, respectively, and the lactic acid (LA) was 1.30 and 2.81 g/kg dry matter (DM), respectively. Compared with CK, L had a lower pH and higher LA from days 1 to 5 (P < 0.05), a lower FWL from days 5 to 100 (P < 0.05), and a greater abundance of Lactiplantibacillus from days 1 to 15 (P < 0.05). The main bacterial genera were Leuconostoc and Weissella in CK and Lactiplantibacillus, Leuconostoc, and Weissella in L on day 1; Lactiplantibacillus in all silages from days 3 to 40; and Lactiplantibacillus and Lentilactobacillus in all silages on day 100.
conclusionsSweet sorghum silage fermented relatively slowly during the first day. Moreover, inoculation with LAB accelerated fermentation and optimized bacterial communities during the initial fermentation phase. Inoculation with LAB also reduced the silage FWL, and the LAB succession relay occurred in the silage throughout the fermentation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.