Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443886›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2024

Association between preoperative shock index and hypotension after spinal anesthesia for non-elective cesarean section: a prospective cohort study.

Shirish Silwal, Asish Subedi, Balkrishna Bhattarai, Ashish Ghimire

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04692870 (Association Between Preoperative Shock Index and Hypotension After Spinal Anaesthesia for Non-elective Caesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04692870 completednot on this map

Association Between Preoperative Shock Index and Hypotension After Spinal Anaesthesia for Non-elective Caesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorB.P. Koirala Institute of Health SciencesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled337ConditionsHypotension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shirish SilwalDepartment of Anesthesia, Bharatpur Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal.
Asish SubediDepartment of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. asish_subedi@alumni.harvard.edu.
Balkrishna BhattaraiDepartment of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Ashish GhimireDepartment of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShock index (SI) is calculated as heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure. In the obstetric population, SI of ≥ 0.9 is associated with maternal adverse outcomes. Our primary aim was to investigate the association between SI and post-spinal hypotension in non-elective cesarean section.

methodsIn this prospective, observational study, term parturient of ASA physical status II, and urgency categories 2 and 3, undergoing non-elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia were enrolled. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to explore the association between baseline SI (categorized as < 0.9 and ≥ 0.9) and hypotension after spinal anesthesia. The diagnostic ability of the baseline SI to predict post-spinal hypotension was assessed using ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curves.

resultsThree hundred forty-two parturient were recruited, and among them, 335 were analyzed. One hundred fifty-five (46.27%) parturients developed post-spinal hypotension, and 114 (34.03%) reported post-delivery hypotension. Preoperative SI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.77; 95% CI, 1.15-6.66; p = 0.023) and thoracic sensory block height > 4 (AOR, 2.33; 95%CI, 1.14-4.76; p = 0.020) were associated with post-spinal hypotension. Preoperative SI (AOR, 4.34; 95%CI, 1.72-10.94; p = 0.002) and anxiety (AOR,1.22; 95%CI, 1.06-1.40; p = 0.004) were associated with post-delivery hypotension. Area under the ROC curve for SI alone in predicting hypotension before and after delivery was 0.53 (95%CI 0.49-0.57) and 0.56 (95%CI 0.51-0.60) respectively. However, the model performance as reflected by ROC curve for the multivariable logistic regression analysis was 0.623 for post-spinal hypotension and 0.679 for post-delivery hypotension, respectively.

conclusionIn parturients undergoing non-elective cesarean section, baseline SI ≥ 0.9 was associated with post-spinal and post-delivery hypotension. While the SI alone showed limited predictive power for post-spinal and post-delivery hypotension, integrating it with other risk factors improved the model's predictive ability.

trial registrationRegistration number: NCT04692870. Date of registration: 05/01/2021. Website: https://clinicaltrials.gov .

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalCesarean SectionHypotensionAdultBlood PressureCohort StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesShockCesarean sectionHypotensionShock IndexSpinal Anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID39443886
PMCPMC11515677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.