ArticleBMC medical education2024
Medical learner perspectives on elements of an educational rural generalist pathway: survey outcomes.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (NOSM U) continues to be challenged in meeting its social accountability mandate of addressing the rural health human resource crises in its catchment of Northern Ontario. Its new educational initiative, the Rural Generalist Pathway (RGP) aims to graduate family physicians specifically prepared for rural practice. This study elicits the perspective of NOSM U learners on the various components being considered for this educational pathway.
methodsA mixed methods survey was created for each of two medical learner groups, undergraduate NOSM U students and its family medicine residents. Quantitative data was analyzed for frequencies and percentages and qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.
resultsWith a response rate of 24.6% for undergraduates and 37.9% for residents, the survey discovered undergraduates consider rural clinical rotations as the most valuable experiences in rural medicine. Among the findings, both the majority of medical students and residents (87.3% and 87.9% respectively) agreed that support for a resident's family well-being and community integration was the element of the pathway most likely to influence them in pursuing the RGP. Mentorship by a practicing rural physician was an element highly supported by 81% of undergraduate and 81.8% of postgraduate learners as likely to influence them to take the RGP. DISCUSSION: Incorporating learner perceptions into the development of the RGP could help focus institutional resources and enhance learner participation in this pathway, producing more rural family doctors to serve Northern Ontario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.