ArticleCell proliferation2025
RETRACTION: Tanshinone I attenuates the malignant biological properties of ovarian cancer by inducing apoptosis and autophagy via the inactivation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.
Article in Cell proliferation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
J. Zhou , Y.-y. Jiang , H. Chen , Y.-c. Wu , and L. Zhang , "Tanshinone I Attenuates the Malignant Biological Properties of Ovarian Cancer by Inducing Apoptosis and Autophagy via the Inactivation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway," Cell Proliferation 53, no. 2 (2020): e12739. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12739. The above article, published online on 09 December 2019, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and has been retracted by agreement between the journal Deputy Editor, Yunfeng Lin; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. A third party contacted the publisher to report that duplicated images had been detected in multiple different articles by different author groups, each of which described different experimental conditions. The image duplications are listed as follows: Images in Figure 1C were duplicated in Wang et al. 2019 (https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S221161), which was submitted and published prior to the publication of this article in Cell Proliferation. In addition, duplicate images from Figures 1C, 1D, 2C, 3B, 3D, 4C, 4D, and 5D were detected in many other articles by different author groups that had been published subsequent to this article. The authors responded to an inquiry by the publisher regarding these concerns and shared what were labeled as original images for Figures 1-6 but did not share the original images for the cell proliferation assays that had been used in Figure 1. The editors reviewed this evidence and found that it did not properly explain the duplications across different articles. The retraction has been agreed to because the duplications of images across different articles fundamentally compromises the conclusions and results presented in the article. The authors disagree with the retraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.