Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39443775›Full record

ArticleNature2024

The importance of family-based sampling for biobanks.

Neil M Davies, Gibran Hemani, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Hilary C Martin, Melinda C Mills, Peter M Visscher, Loïc Yengo, Alexander Strudwick Young, Matthew C Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic architectures of brain-related traits are shaped by strong selective constraints.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Association analysis between genetic nurturing effects ofBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Neil M DaviesDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. neil.m.davies@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2460-0508
Gibran HemaniMedical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0920-1055
Jenae M NeiderhiserDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4474-5330
Hilary C MartinHuman Genetics Programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4454-9084
Melinda C MillsDepartment of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1704-0001
Peter M VisscherInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2143-8760
Loïc YengoInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4272-9305
Alexander Strudwick YoungUCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Matthew C KellerInstitute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. matthew.c.keller@colorado.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-9882

Funding

The Early Growth and Development Study Pediatric CohortUH3OD023389 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Jody M. Ganiban, Leslie Diane Leve · 2018 to 2026
$16.6M
CHARGE Consortium: Omics Discovery for CVD and Aging PhenotypesR01HL105756 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Bruce M Psaty, NICHOLAS L SMITH · 2011 to 2026
$9.5M
13/24 The Healthy Brain and Child Development National ConsortiumU01DA055361 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Koraly E Perez-Edgar, Aleksandra Ewa Zgierska · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Estimating the genetic and environmental architecture of psychiatric disordersR01MH100141 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI KELLER, MATTHEW CHARLES · 2013 to 2022
$5.3M
An adoption study of the development of early substance use: the joint roles of genetic influences, prenatal risk, rearing environment, and pubertal maturationR01DA045108 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI NEIDERHISER, JENAE M. · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
Causes and consequences of mental disorders: The environmental and genetic influences of parents on offspring.R01MH130448 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Matthew Charles Keller · 2022 to 2026
$3.7M
Mendelian imputation for family-based GWAS and association-by-proxy in diverse ancestriesR01AG083379 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Alexander Thomas Ian Strudwick Young · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105756NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083379NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045108NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA055361NIH HHS UH3 OD023389NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100141NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH130448Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biobanks aim to improve our understanding of health and disease by collecting and analysing diverse biological and phenotypic information in large samples. So far, biobanks have largely pursued a population-based sampling strategy, where the individual is the unit of sampling, and familial relatedness occurs sporadically and by chance. This strategy has been remarkably efficient and successful, leading to thousands of scientific discoveries across multiple research domains, and plans for the next wave of biobanks are underway. In this Perspective, we discuss the strengths and limitations of a complementary sampling strategy for future biobanks based on oversampling of close genetic relatives. Such family-based samples facilitate research that clarifies causal relationships between putative risk factors and outcomes, particularly in estimates of genetic effects, because they enable analyses that reduce or eliminate confounding due to familial and demographic factors. Family-based biobank samples would also shed new light on fundamental questions across multiple fields that are often difficult to explore in population-based samples. Despite the potential for higher costs and greater analytical complexity, the many advantages of family-based samples should often outweigh their potential challenges.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksFamilyFamily HealthGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPedigree

Identifiers

PMID39443775
PMCPMC11623399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.